Politics & Policy
Senate Subcommittee Votes Down Requirement That Senators Vote On Voting Procedures
WASHINGTON — The Senate Subcommittee on Legislative Protocols voted 12-0 Wednesday to reject Resolution 847-B, which would have required senators to cast formal votes when determining voting procedures for future legislation. The measure, proposed by freshman Senator John Ossoff (D-GA), aimed to establish what he called 'basic accountability in our democratic mechanisms.'
'We're not here to vote on voting,' said Subcommittee Chair Richard Burr (R-NC), adjusting his tie with both hands. 'We're here to vote on legislation. Adding additional voting layers creates unnecessary friction in the legislative workflow.'
Burr explained that senators have traditionally determined voting methods through what he termed '-based procedural acknowledgment' — a system where the committee chair announces the voting method and no one objects. 'If it's not broken, why regulate it?' Burr asked, tapping his microphone for emphasis. 'We've been using this system since the Truman administration.'
The rejected resolution would have mandated that all voting procedure decisions be recorded in the Congressional Record, with each senator's position clearly documented. Opponents argued this would create what Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV) called 'vote inflation.'
'We already vote on bills, amendments, cloture motions, and confirmation hearings,' Capito stated, shuffling through a binder overflowing with sticky notes. 'Adding votes about voting would push our voting apparatus beyond sustainable limits.'
Senator Ossoff's office had prepared extensive documentation showing that the current system has led to confusion seventeen times in the past decade, including a 2019 incident where senators believed they were voting by voice when the chair had actually called for a standing vote. Three senior senators required medical attention after attempting to maintain standing positions for forty-five minutes.
'The American people deserve transparency,' Ossoff argued during the hearing, his voice rising slightly above the hum of the malfunctioning air conditioning unit. 'When we make decisions about how we make decisions, those decisions should themselves be decided through proper democratic channels.'
Committee members responded by passing around a drinks cooler instead of using the traditional voice vote system. Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) later explained that the cooler passage 'demonstrated the efficiency of non-documented -based decision-making.'
Staffers reported that during the deliberation, Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) accidentally voiced support for the resolution while attempting to order lunch from the Senate cafeteria. The committee unanimously agreed to strike his comment from the record, citing what Burr called 'clearly extraneous dietary-related verbal emissions.'
The subcommittee then moved to what was labeled 'emergency procedural modernization' — replacing all voting terminology with sports metaphors. Henceforth, voice votes will be called 'audible plays,' roll call votes will be 'roster checks,' and unanimous consent will be 'full-team agreement.'
'This modernization will streamline communications,' said Senator John Cornyn (R-TX), demonstrating a football signal for 'tabling a motion.' 'We're bringing legislative procedure into the 21st century.'
As the hearing concluded, senators struggled to exit the room because no formal vote had been taken to adjourn. After thirty-seven minutes of confused hesitation, staffers began dimming the lights, prompting senators to depart based on what one aide called 'ambient lighting-based .'
The Government Accountability Office confirmed it would not investigate the incident, noting that without formal voting procedures established, there was no procedural violation to document.